I do realise that but the fact you used quotes only from me infers a bias.
It implies that I was quoting you. There is no implication of bias intended.
Let me ask, who do you think was more precise? In the explanations and arguments.
I think you were equally imprecise although you tended to be more correct.
That is not only not precise but its blatantly wrong.
But forgive me for being pedantic.
Also, it doesn't use an array, it uses a pointer. Also known as a "dynamic array", but it's just a pointer to the first element.
with regards to std::string.
Pedantically, preciseness is orthogonal to correctness.
I would characterize the statement as imprecise. If you want to consider the implementation, std::string can certainly be thought of as an object containing a pointer to a dynamic array, small string optimizations not withstanding.
We can go round all day with semantics. My Final point being I believe I was well within my posting rights to defend my comments from the obvious trolling of IWishIKnew, he was clearly there to have a shot at me, for whatever reason I do not know.