Superdude, I haven't seen her post in a LONG time. Probably got fed up with this forum. It's really not that great of a forum outside of the consistent members.
Superdude, I haven't seen her post in a LONG time. Probably got fed up with this forum. It's really not that great of a forum outside of the consistent members.
Yeah, I think Albatross has either moved on or gave up on this forum (though it is highly unlikely the latter). She hasn't posted since Nov 14, 2012.
In terms of programming forums, it is one of the best. Unfortunately, here lately it seems the Lounge has blown up with topics and less topics in programming C++.
Lumpkin wrote:
I have to say either LB, devon, or BHX for funniest.
1 - Catfish and his aliases
2 - LB? [insert quote here]
3 - Disch
4 - Quite a lot, including LB, Disch, Grey Wolf and Null
5 - That's a nice question but a bit generic, and as such it will never have a good answer.
6 - SpoonLicker
7 - Like 4, quite a lot, as long as some basical rules are followed (such as being friendly yourself, [...])
8 - Albatross. Despite not seeing this user from long time, it's many times quoted for being a good one.
9 - SpoonLicker
I feel bad saying part from the obvious spoonlicker ones but I dont much rate your options.
theres 4 catagories; theres people who know stuff, theres people who are good at helping and know stuff, theres people who ask questions cos they want to know stuff and theres people who just mess around and socialize.
people here are a mixture of those four categories.
im neither of the first two just yet but I am working on it.
In my case I know how to make music, sound effects, pixel art, 3d models, program, design, etc in the game development trade. Yet I can safely say I have none of them mastered.
Honestly, I don't think I am even a flicker in anyone's mind so I don't list anywhere on there.
"Jack of all trades" is slang for someone who is good at lots of different things (trades means things like smithing, baking. etc. but that meaning is antiquated). I've heard that "Jack" refers to the card, i.e., it's a good card but not as powerful as the Ace (usually), King or Queen, but I don't know how true that is. "Master of none" should be pretty obvious.