Why would the designers of Java think this was OK?

Pages: 12
closed account (Dy7SLyTq)
I see java and android as languages that you dont need to know you just look bits up and use them
correct me if im wrong, but i dont think andriod is a language
closed account (18hDSL3A)
I see java and android as languages that you dont need to know you just look bits up and use them, I cant learn to use these languages freely like c++.


What an immensely silly thing to say. Of course you need to "know" Java, but Java is not C++ so the things you need to know about Java are different then the ones you need to know about C++. The fact that you can use Java without being overwhelmed with it's subtle pitfalls and intricacies at every turn is a *strength* and is a natural effect of it being a higher-level language. Just because you can't understand why something is done a certain way doesn't necessarily mean it is a flaw in a language, just a hole in your knowledge that needs to be filled.
@devon @DTS @Junkie @Lumpkin

Please do not derail topics.
Im not, Im complaining about clunky java programming too.

unless you were just reminding us incase it was gonna happen.
Last edited on
This thread is about a specific feature of Java, not about your opinion of Java as a whole.
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.
Pages: 12