|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| twicker (53) | ||
Fixed. Thanks! The change in the [code] tag is no longer retroactive, so old posts will interpret inner tags in code segments, just as before. I will think about something for the newer ones, since you find that functionality useful. | ||
|
|
||
| Duoas (5977) | ||
|
I was thinking about that some more today... Typically, an italic code tag will look like this:
Whereas someone's array indexing will look like this: for (i = 0; s[i]; i++)One is preceeded by whitespace, the other is not. [edit] It is preceeded by an alphanumeric. [/edit] Of course, this isn't always true... but it may be a useful rule of thumb. Just an idea. | ||
|
Last edited on
|
||
| twicker (53) | |
|
I just reenabled tag processing in both [code] and [output] tags. I'm not so worried about the [i] thing. It would only show in italics if the code fragment also included the closing tag - which is unlikely in C++. My only concern was that that was a hack - I never intended to allow tags in code segments... but if at the end it's useful, let's use it! | |
|
|
|
| Duoas (5977) | |
| Sweet! Thanks! | |
|
|
|
| QWERTYman (443) | ||
So, how would the output tags be used?HEER EES MY COOODE
Or... HEER EES MY COOODE [output]Error: HEER not identified[/output]FOUNDEDED A GLITCH. That's the result of having the output tag inside the code tag. Now I'm just trying to find out how to do it without having a newline using the new tag. Now. How do you guys post the tags themselves? I forget. | ||
|
Last edited on
|
||
| Bazzy (6258) | |||||
Is the [code]---[/code] thing of some posts earlier
Something like [co[b[b][/b]][/b]de][/co[b[b][/b]][/b]de] | |||||
|
|
|||||
| QWERTYman (443) | ||||
|
Oh, alright. Testing, one, two... [code] It worked. Now...
This will help extensively with noob assistance. | ||||
|
Last edited on
|
||||
| QWERTYman (443) | |
|
Double post, but I want to get my count to 500 >_> Anyway, I think a really good feature would be to see who is online at the time. For instance, at the bottom (or wherever), have a line of text that's like, Online now: Bazzy, helios, Duoas, QWERTYman, chrisname, twicker Yeaaaaaaah. | |
|
Last edited on
|
|
| chrisname (4922) | |
| Yeah; that would be good. | |
|
|
|
| firedraco (4744) | |
| I support an online now thing. Would be cool. | |
|
|
|
| twicker (53) | ||
Solved. | ||
|
|
||