- Forum
- UNIX/Linux Programming
- what's the difference between 'ip addr a
what's the difference between 'ip addr add' and 'ifconfig eth0:1'
There are two ways to config more IP addr on a dev:
1. ip addr add
2. ifconfig ethn:m
I want to know the difference in source code layer. Following is what I found:
For 1,ip addr add, netlink is used for communication between user space and kernel space. The handler for this cmd is inet_rtm_newaddr(), then it will call __inet_insert_ifa() in which it will add a new in_ifaddr struct to net_device->(in_device *)ip_ptr-> (in_ifaddr *) ifa_list.
For 2,ifconifg ethn:m, ioctl is used. Call chain is: inet_ioctl->devinet_ioctl -> inet_set_ifa -> inet_insert_ifa -> __inet_insert_ifa.
It seems that there is no difference. But I have been told they are different.
Where is the difference?
Thanks in advantage.
1. ip addr add
2. ifconfig ethn:m
I want to know the difference in source code layer. Following is what I found:
For 1,ip addr add, netlink is used for communication between user space and kernel space. The handler for this cmd is inet_rtm_newaddr(), then it will call __inet_insert_ifa() in which it will add a new in_ifaddr struct to net_device->(in_device *)ip_ptr-> (in_ifaddr *) ifa_list.
For 2,ifconifg ethn:m, ioctl is used. Call chain is: inet_ioctl->devinet_ioctl -> inet_set_ifa -> inet_insert_ifa -> __inet_insert_ifa.
It seems that there is no difference. But I have been told they are different.
Where is the difference?
Thanks in advantage.
| on a dev |
ifconfig's being phased out. ip is the new way. My Arch Linux installation doesn't install ifconfig, it just uses ip.
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.