Destructor overloading ?

[z0XLy60M]

Like a constructor ...
Can a destructor be overloaded ?

Pls give reasons too...

[cire]

No, destructors cannot be overloaded.

[z0XLy60M]

Okay..
And why is that..?

Is it not possible for a destructor to destruct in different ways..?

[maeriden]

And why is that..?

Because it is not implemented.

If you want to perform a particular task before deleting an object you can implement a Delete() of maybe Destruct() method for your class and call it manually

[z0XLy60M]

Hmm...
Owkaez...
:)

[coder777]

Yes, a destructor can be overloaded.

You should make the base destructor virtual. That guarantees that the destructors of all derived classes are called.

The destructor has of course only one form
~ClassName()
because it's called automatically

[helios]

coder777: You're confusing overloaded and overridden.

[z0XLy60M]

coder777,
hmmm ...what exactly could be the use of that ...?
making it virtual ?

I don't think it classifies as "overloading"