ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿diff(B,C)? ¿is just about how it would be shared later? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿who has the right to decide/ who decides how it would be shared? ¿Party A or B? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿why would `Party A' want to practice altruism? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿what about Party G, that could not get an sponsor and is betting on the final consumers? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
chocolate por la noticia the idea was that others could not claim ownership and stop it from being available. |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
I understood: you can patent algorithms http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter#The_algorithm_exception_and_the_patent-eligibility_trilogy |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
> To plagiarize is to take a combination known to be useful > and to falsely claim that you discovered the combination. > (later) re-observe the useful combinations I have taken the time and effort to discover |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
you said that C is being paying by a second party. |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿how should I interpret C works for C? ¿is it C decides what combination to create, but A imposes that to B? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
>> ¿who has the right to decide/ who decides how it would be shared? ¿Party A or B? > Read A's contract that B signed? wrong answer. They do not have any right "the combination should be freely shared". If it were just a matter of read the contract, ¿why do you bother with the article? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
let's say that the contract let A to decide if the combination may be shared. B efforts were paid by A effort. ¿what did A gain? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
In your two groups the discovers are payed by their efforts. |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
Ownership \Own"er*ship\, n. The state of being an owner; the right to own; exclusive right of possession; legal or just claim or title; proprietorship. [1913 Webster] |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿what are the consequences of the having DRM on `the shortest path from two nodes in a directed graph with positive weights algorithm'? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
and Pierre Menard wrote the Quixote |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿why do you not consider that as viral? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
¿why do you not consider closed source as viral? |
ne555 wrote: |
---|
I may have misread you. It seems that you are too eager to say `I discovered this' when the idea presented is not new. |