Wow, this thread has changed.
|You say that like it means anything. I don't know him anymore than I know you.|
I think he was saying it in reference to me being the only one who seems to be defending him. And yes I did pull him up where I needed to as well:
|So only those with I.Q. >= 160 need apply?|
I think he was referring to his belief (not sure what is true) that you have no understanding of this topic.
|I really wish some Windows expert would come by and analyze the code he posted. Its simplicity makes me doubt it actually does what it's advertised to do.|
I personally have no understanding of the WINAPI myself. But, I am sure if you read the code and google around a bit you would be able to decipher it.
|You have so many contradicting statements in this thread alone it makes me have little faith in your actual programming ability. |
Out of personal curiosity (and the fact that searching through 8 pages seems a gigantic task) will you please provide examples?
|Having beta testers other than yourself is not a bad thing. |
Probably the first logical comment in a couple of pages. +1
| there is no guarantee that they are actually three separate people or just one person sock puppeting.|
LOL, we have completely different areas of (for lack of a better word) expertise. SpaceWorm: WINAPI, Maleware, etc.
I know that this is no rigorous proof, but I am afraid that is the best I can do.
|Then he pulled Script Coder into it, who has (as of yet) not posted to verify.|
So terribly sorry (genuine). The argument took place at 23h00 on 30Aug 2013 and I was sleeping like a baby (despite having recently watched the first SAW movie, amazing :) ).
I can say that I truly believe that SpaceWorm has got the skill to code what he says he has. I can say this because during out (unfortunately short lived) partnership, he taught me quite a bit on process injection, etc.
I do not think my post was non-PC and so I hope it does not offend anyone.
@SpaceWorm: Personally I would say the best thing you can do now, is post an executable.