helios wrote:
Ignoring my interpretation, all it says is that the temperature will stay low is a fact. |
But also this isn't a fact. We could assume, if the ecliptic don't change, then we should mean, that the temperature on Antarctica should be lower than the average temperature on earth.
But I didn't consider new streams like golf stream.
And I didn't consider that the ecliptic could change, so that after such a change the equator could meet the poles.
Also could be thinkable, that the gradient of the axis of the earth could change, so that in an extreme case, the south pole could point an age long directly to the sun, and night never comes. So the south pole could become also the hottest region of the Earth.
I don't assume now, that this would happen. But can I be sure? And did the writers of this text really consider these possibilities and all others, which I didn't think of now. And did they really get evidence for all?
This seems to me quite unthinkable.
I didn't say it never can be different, when somebody says "never", but I doubt it. And if I can think only of one possibility more (or less considering always), than I know, they are not right.
And until now, I could always find such a possibiliy more ore less. Maybe in a rare case I cannot find such a possibility. But if I cannot find it, this will not mean, that there is none, but only that I am not able to find it.
But there are exceptions of this rule: other rules of thinking, like rules for logic or mathematics or exact definitions.
But limited phantasy or limited knowledge shouldn't be an exception for this rule.
And normally for correct thoughts, these words are not necessary. Or did you read ever something like:
if a<b and b<c then always a<c
If I hear such a sentence, I hear in my mind, that the writer himself has doubts or would think, others could have doubts.
Oh, I also doubt the word "all". When you hear all people do this or did this, then you also should doubt.
Maybe one person was sitting on the toilette and didn't do what all the others did.
also none
also everybody
also nobody
also nothing
also everything
I think we should make a catalogue of such words. And the humans should learn these words by heart. And when they hear such a word, they automatically should doubt. Then not much nonsense could be told anymore.
Sorry, this was not so a good idea. If everybody would know this, then the nonses tellers, would say the same nonsense, but without these words. And the nonsense couldn't be anymore so easily discovered. Best, I know about it, and this should be my secret. What a pity, that I now had told it.